Received: from chollian.dacom.co.kr (chollian.dacom.co.kr [184.108.40.206]) by faraday.phys.psu.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA22673 for
; Sat, 2 Mar 1996 07:37:58 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by chollian.dacom.co.kr (8.6.9H1/8.6.9) id VAA21195 for firstname.lastname@example.org; Sat, 2 Mar 1996 21:39:16 +0900 Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 21:39:16 +0900 From: CHOLLIAN-USER Subject: Dear Manager Message-Id: <199603021239.VAA21195@chollian.dacom.co.kr> Apparently-To: email@example.com Status: R I have an odd think . And I am not professional scientist. So I have no way to examine its errors. Could you send your opinion to me? I beg your pardon for my unskillful english, wrong expressions. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- : CONTRADICTION OF THE THEORY OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-1. I saw an extraodinary picture. A woman in the picture was seen differently. Sometimes she was thought an old woman. Sometimes, a young lady. That depends who is the observer. The truth that we believe absolute thing may be like this. ******************************************************************* 2-1. Let us suppose that we have two identical clocks and the time of the earth is twice later than that of the Mars. If it is, when the clock of the earth points to one hour having passed, that of the Mars will points to two hours having passed. According to the theory of special relativity, the time relation between the moving observer and stationary observer is like the following. when the clock of the stationary observer points to the time T@ having passed, that of the moving observer will points to the time T@R having passed. Where, R = square root of 1 - v^2/c^2 v ; speed of relative motion c ; speed of light Therefore we can conclude that t = t@/R : relationship of speed of time passing between the moving observer and stationary one. - time dilation equation - T = T@R : relationship of quantity of the elapsed time between the two observers. * from now this equation will be called "the result of time dilation." [[Now let us examine the theoretical fault of the theory of special relativity]] 2-2. The light was shot forth from the plane of flying at the speed V with respect to the stationary observer on the earth's surface. Let us suppose that the time T has passed for the pilot on the plane when the time T@ has passed for the stationary observer on the ground. For the pilot, in his own frame of reference, by the second postulate of Einstein the distance between the plane(pilot) and light(photon) is CT. In order to simplify, we shall assume that the speed V is in +x direction as Einstein did in his work. And also for an observer on the ground, as seen from his own frame of reference, the distance between the light(photon) and plane is CT@ - VT@. When we think on the basis of time relation between the two observers, by "the result of time dilation", we can conclude that CT = CT@R On the other hand, by the Lorentz trnsformation ( L = L@R ), the distance relation between the two observers is CT = ( CT@ - VT@ )R So we know CT@R = ( CT@ - VT@ )R Therefore T@ = 0 or V = 0 or V = C At last the theory of special relativity was denied!! What do you think about this unexpected result ? Your contact internet is "firstname.lastname@example.org". "email@example.com" I think the information source of astronomy is electromagnetic waves. The accurate knowledges for electromagnetic waves in the space is intrinsic tool to understand the nature of stars, novas etc. I don't think the existence of "ETHER" should be discarded. I don't think the hypothesys for ether[Einstein' one = not existing material] is correct. Maybe it is gravitational field itself, I think. Electromagnetic waves in the space will suffer its influence. So unknown effect -maybe red shift- will be increased and appear in the form of Hubble's Law? If there is another form of the ether many aspects of astrophysics sould be discarded. On the ground, thought that the sun goes around the earth seems to be right. But in a view of the solar system it was authenticated as a wrong concept. In a small scale like laboratory the theory of relativity seems to good. However, in a large scale in the universe there is difficult problems in theories based on relativity. There must be another way to verify relativity. What is it? Jeong M. H.